What cover crops were popular before inorganic fertilizer?

Published Feb 15, 2021 


Anonymous Member
By Anonymous Member


What cover crops did farmers use prior to inorganic forms of fertilizer becoming popular?

Question Added

Anonymous Member
Anonymous Member
Feb 15, 2021  

Categories: Fertility, Cover Crops, NRCS

4 Upvotes
2 Answers
1 Share
2 Reposts

Post As

Viewable By

My Followers
  • Everyone

    Every person viewing AgFuse.

  • My Followers

    Members who follow me.

  • Group Members

    Select a group I follow.

2 Answers

By Mark Smith
Published Feb 19, 2021 

That is an interesting question, that actually has several aspects to it. First, according to several source documents, the simple answer (according to Schoepf 1783-1784 author of ‘American Husbandry’) when cover crops were used, they were typically native grasses and clover with the field being left fallow. Generally a crop rotation was used as had been done for 1000’s of years. Colonists did not generally utilize cover crops to their benefit for various reasons, the main being cost and availability of labor. before 1800 virtually every American farm was a subsistence farm, and as such there would generally not be sufficient funds for purchase of specialized cover crop seed, neither for the labor necessary to plant a fallow field. Thus, what was at hand and could grow naturally dominated. For reference (highlighting the lack of a home market which affected purchase decisions by farmers of the period): in 1800, Pittsburgh, PA had just over 4000 people, and had the largest inland town population in the country. This being said, most farmers would find rotation of crops more cost effective than cover cropping since land was so abundant, and there wasn’t sufficient manpower available to invest in soil quality (unlike Europe). In fact, there are many records of colonial governors repeatedly justifying labor expenses to the ‘Crown’ and the trading companies as it was as much as 50 times the cost of labor in England (this is outside of a few coastal farms that were near a port and able to sell something for export to other colonies or abroad). Note that England, where land was (and still is) extremely expensive (with no open land of any consequence available) and labor cheap (serfs and end indentured servants where unemployment was rampant), there was more impetus for maximizing the efficiency of the soil available for farms. the Colonies, on the other hand, had plentiful land and labor was expensive (as you might expect, the population/acre were vastly different). The invention of the cultivator had a significant secondary impact on soil health as it reduced labor cost (much more can be written on this). An excellent book on tomato culture written in 1919 also mentions clover as the primary cover crop, but identifies that the cultivator improved the success of the cover crop. Additionally, the author noted that one tomato farm identified the the best mix as wood ash, clover and commercial fertilizer mixed with ‘well rotted stable manure’, so we see an interesting transition from pre-commercial fertilizer to commercial fertilizer alone with a mix of the two being used successfully. Note that this would likely not have a negative impact on soil organic matter (well known by this time) while maximizing agronomic efficiency.

What cover crops were popular before inorganic fertilizer?

That is an interesting question, that actually has several aspects to it. First, according to several source documents, the simple answer (according to Schoepf 1783-1784 author of ‘American Husbandry’) when cover crops were used, they were typically native grasses and clover with the field being left fallow. Generally a crop rotation was used as had been done for 1000’s of years. Colonists did not generally utilize cover crops to their benefit for various reasons, the main being cost and availability of labor. before 1800 virtually every American farm was a subsistence farm, and as such there would generally not be sufficient funds for purchase of specialized cover crop seed, neither for the labor necessary to plant a fallow field. Thus, what was at hand and could grow naturally dominated. For reference (highlighting the lack of a home market which affected purchase decisions by farmers of the period): in 1800, Pittsburgh, PA had just over 4000 people, and had the largest inland town population in the country. This being said, most farmers would find rotation of crops more cost effective than cover cropping since land was so abundant, and there wasn’t sufficient manpower available to invest in soil quality (unlike Europe). In fact, there are many records of colonial governors repeatedly justifying labor expenses to the ‘Crown’ and the trading companies as it was as much as 50 times the cost of labor in England (this is outside of a few coastal farms that were near a port and able to sell something for export to other colonies or abroad). Note that England, where land was (and still is) extremely expensive (with no open land of any consequence available) and labor cheap (serfs and end indentured servants where unemployment was rampant), there was more impetus for maximizing the efficiency of the soil available for farms. the Colonies, on the other hand, had plentiful land and labor was expensive (as you might expect, the population/acre were vastly different). The invention of the cultivator had a significant secondary impact on soil health as it reduced labor cost (much more can be written on this). An excellent book on tomato culture written in 1919 also mentions clover as the primary cover crop, but identifies that the cultivator improved the success of the cover crop. Additionally, the author noted that one tomato farm identified the the best mix as wood ash, clover and commercial fertilizer mixed with ‘well rotted stable manure’, so we see an interesting transition from pre-commercial fertilizer to commercial fertilizer alone with a mix of the two being used successfully. Note that this would likely not have a negative impact on soil organic matter (well known by this time) while maximizing agronomic efficiency.

Read more »

Categories: Fertility, Cover Crops, NRCS

8 Upvotes
1 Comment
1 Repost

Post As

Post As

Viewable By

My Followers
  • Everyone

    Every person viewing AgFuse.

  • My Followers

    Members who follow me.

  • Group Members

    Select a group I follow.

Mark Smith Cumberland City, TN
Feb 19, 2021
Correction, Lancaster, PA was identified as the ‘largest inland town’ with a population in 1800 of 4292 ppl. My apologies - had football on the brain - Ha!

Post As

By Risa DeMasi
Published Mar 4, 2021 

According to a 1913 USDA Bulletin the following were being used: Alfalfa, Red Clover, Cowpea, Rye and Broom Sedge

According to a 1918 USDA Illustrated Lecture on Green Manuring, these were being used: Red Clover, Crimson Clover, Sweet Clover, Soybeans & Cowpeas, Velvet Bean, Bur Clover, Vetch, Field Peas, Lupines, Horse Bean, Rape, White Mustard, Rye, Millet, Buckwheat, Mexican Clover (from the Coffee family). 

According to a 1902 Bulletin from the Hatch Experiment Station at the Massachusetts Agricultural College the following were being used: Rye, Oats, Barley, Peas, Soybeans, Cow Pea, Hairy Vetch, Red Clover, Crimson Clover

According to a 1925 Bulletin from the University of California College of Agriculture Berseem Clover (also known as Egyptian Clover) was showing promise for maintaining soils. 

I also have a USDA 1935 Bulletin on Cover Crops but can't quite put my fingers on it at the moment...

Categories: Fertility, Cover Crops, NRCS

6 Upvotes
3 Comments
1 Repost

Post As

Post As

Viewable By

My Followers
  • Everyone

    Every person viewing AgFuse.

  • My Followers

    Members who follow me.

  • Group Members

    Select a group I follow.

Mark Smith Cumberland City, TN
Mar 5, 2021
Great stuff, and thank you. We can clearly see that the industrial revolution, which prompted mechanized agriculture, had a positive impact on soil quality. In fact, after Obed Hussey invented the reaper, concurrent with the industrial revolution, it was reported that all agricultural equipment developed after 1840 looked primarily at labor efficiency. In a History of Agriculture in the Northeastern United States 1620-1840, the population of cities had to reach a sufficient point to effectively create a commercial agricultural market, and this in turn created the economic drive for more efficient farming here in the United States as the farmers could then afford to invest in pasture improvements. We should never forget that most of the voter crops we used, even at the turn of the century, are not traditionally native to North America (being imported once an economy in the United States developed, and/or brought over by immigrants who had the means to do so themselves). The cowpea, for example, is believed to have originated in West Africa. While Wiki identifies the first mention of cowpea in the U.S. is 1798, it was first used as fodder for cattle. Red clover is native to Europe, while white clover appears to be native to North America. We often forget that (like our population) our agriculture was also brought over from the Old World, and there are transition periods dependent upon logistics and economy. Very interesting stuff! Those are great references :)
Post Img

Post As

Risa DeMasi Salem, OR
Mar 5, 2021
Thanks, and yes, just as nature isn't static it's important to qualify native as to 'when' in addition to 'where'. Regionally adapted species deserve their due as valuable tools, and should always be used in the right place at the right time and for the designated purpose.

Post As

Mark Smith Cumberland City, TN
Mar 6, 2021
Too true my friend - the original question I responded to - cover crops in use before inorganic fertilizer, is a very nuanced question. As chemical fertilizers were in use in the 1800s, the most historically correct answer would likely be found in the 1700s to early/mid 1800s. As my grandfather was a sharecrop cotton farmer (I inherited much of his library), I know that even pre-depression through post depression (post industrial revolution), the economics of small farms still had an impact on crop rotation and cover cropping choices (and limitations - add to the nuances of an accurate answer).

Post As